SAT
The Full Cycle
1380
1560
+180
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Junior, independent school, Northeast
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Reading pacing rebuilt over twelve weeks; math error rate cut from 9 per test to 2.
Outcomes
We measure our work in score reports
Every engagement sets a specific target after the diagnostic and reports progress against it in writing. Below: representative score improvements and the preparation behind each.
Illustrative examples shown. The entries below demonstrate the format of our reporting and must be replaced with verified student results before publication. No entry on this page should be read as a claim about an actual student until this notice is removed.
SAT
The Ascent
1440
1580
+140
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Sophomore, boarding school, Mid-Atlantic
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Targeted work on advanced math and punctuation rules; two sittings, ten sessions.
ACT
The Full Cycle
29
35
+6
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Junior, day school, West Coast
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Science section reframed as data literacy; composite gains driven by pacing drills.
GRE
The Ascent
158Q / 160V
168Q / 166V
+16 total
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Ph.D. applicant, economics
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Quant rebuilt from foundations in eight weeks ahead of a December deadline.
GMAT
The Full Cycle
615
705
+90
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] M7 MBA applicant, private equity
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Data Insights raised from 78th to 97th percentile; Focus Edition retake strategy.
SAT
The Full Cycle
1300
1510
+210
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Junior, international family, relocating to US
[REPLACE WITH REAL RESULT] Evidence-based reading habits built from scratch; grammar systematized in six sessions.
How to read these numbers
Score improvements are a function of three variables: the starting point, the runway, and the student's fidelity to the between-session work. Gains compress near the top of every scale — the sixty points between 1500 and 1560 are harder-won than the hundred between 1350 and 1450 — which is why we publish starting scores alongside outcomes, and why we set each student's target individually after the diagnostic rather than advertising a universal number.
We do not guarantee scores, and we would counsel skepticism toward any practice that does. What we commit to is the apparatus that produces results like these: an honest diagnostic, a curriculum built for one student, and reporting that lets a family see progress — or its absence — in writing at every stage.
Discuss what is achievable for your student
A consultation and diagnostic will establish the starting point and an evidence-based target — before any engagement is proposed.
We accept a limited number of students each cycle. Admission is by consultation.
Request a Consultation